![]() ![]() The majority's vote for a Description Project free from any such problems.Īt this point as the organiser of the project I deem the attempt to integrate scores, at least in this fashion, as a failure. This means it not only fails to represent the minority it initially attempted to cater to, but also disrespects Worse yet they decided a unit was summarised as "good" or "bad" or better or worse than somethingĮlse based on these scores. People ignored all the nuance of the descriptions and reduced what they took away from an entry was a mere Star Rating, Unfortunately, however, the way the scoring information was used ended up being a detriment to the project as a whole. Scoring was included within the scope of the UDP to represent the wishes of this minority. We held a vote on the future of the Tier List,Īnd while a majority voted for a Description Project, a non-trivial minority expressed the wish to indeed do away with the Tier List and its many problems, but still have some form of ![]() When the UDP was first conceived, it was as a Tier List replacement. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |